The 9th WorldDendro conference convened
from January 13-17th in the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre. This
building was completed in 2009 at the cost of $1 billion dollars. It has a six
star Green Star environmental rating which is the highest possible rating form
the Green Building Council for Australia and this is the only convention center
in Australia with this rating. It is a very nice building and with our 300
participants, we only take up a small part of the building. We had participants
from 38 different countries. It is
always interesting to hear about the latest developments in dendrochronology
and to meet back up with friends from around the world. I think that I knew 40-50% of the people at
the conference from previous fieldweeks and conferences. We also noticed that the fieldweeks prior to
the conference develop a pretty strong cohort of people. Looking around the audience during the
plenary sessions you could see clumps of fieldweek participants sitting
together.
Melbourne city was beautiful. There was some nice older architecture, public transportation (in every picture I took), some really interesting small alleys with cafes in the road and graffiti on the walls.
There were many excellent presentations during the
conference. A few stood out to be very interesting to me. We actually had a sociologist named Meritxell
Ramirez-Olle who was studying Rob Wilson from St. Andrews University in
Scotland. She was examining how dendrochronologists conduct their research,
interact with students, and develop their ideas. Another presentation examined
the effect of sampling design on climate response, climate reconstruction, and
biomass calculation. David Frank and others had completed a 100% sample of a
half hectare plot. Then they subsampled their data based on targeted sampling,
different area plot sampling, and random sampling. They found some bias in
response from targeted sampling in biomass calculation, but not in climate
response. There is much work on blue light reflectance as a potential
replacement for density. We had a whole plenary session on the status of the
divergence issue. It seems that researchers have started to get their arms
around that problem. David Frank gave
another very good presentation documenting about ten different processes that
people have called divergence. Some of
it seems to have been controlled by standardization procedures and other times
it seems to be a true switching of limiting factors that cause a departure from
temperature response. The research community is narrowing down the geographic
areas that are currently experiencing divergence and creating more refined
definitions of the phenomena. We had a good session on insect outbreak dynamics
and climate effects and response. We
ended with a 45 minute discussion about how best to build to meta datasets of
insect outbreak studies so that we could study them across their entire range
and start to analyze responses to climate and potential effects on climate
reconstruction. The next steps are probably to pursue grants to build a
databank of insect outbreak records similar to the International Multi Proxy
Databank which keeps fire history and charcoal data.
I had the opportunity to meet with most of the people that I
plan to visit in Europe during the latter part of my sabbatical, so I have
started that planning in earnest.
We had a heat wave that exactly coincided with the
conference which probably assured that the sessions were well attended. The picture is a snapshot of my phone when we
stepped out of the conference center at 6pm. 108 degrees at 6pm that day. We had a number of days that were above 110
and five days in a row that were above 100.
I am told this is a record for Melbourne and they have not seen anything
like it for 60-100 years. Our last evening of the conference, we got to
experience the weather change with strong winds, a bit of rain, and a 20 degree
temperature drop in about half an hour. That was an interesting experience and
apparently not uncommon in Melbourne.We took a mid-conference tour to the central highlands. We took four buses up the mountains and sadly our broke down. It seemed like it overheated because the driver was driving at about 5 miles per hour and turned off the air conditioning. In the end, the 2 hour drive took us about 3.5 hours. But it was well worth the trip.
We got to observe some of Australia’s classic vineyards on our drive out to the highlands. We experienced a Eucalyptus forest where trees have grown to about 100 feet tall in 70 years. These trees can grow up to 1 meter (3 feet) in height each year and are very productive.
In 2009, a severe bush fire destroyed the town of Marysville and at the top of the mountain at Lake Mountain Ski Resort, a fire burned through and killed all of the snow gums.
I was able to get a picture of Tom Swetnam and Malcolm
Hughes conversing at the Lake Mountain Ski Resort Café. This picture reminded
me of when they both came out to help with my fieldwork on my masters in 1996.
I think that picture was of them taking a nap on picnic tables after a
particularly long and hot field day.
I had the opportunity to visit the Melbourne Aquarium with
Michelle Ho and Carolyn Copenheaver my first night in the city directly after
traveling from the fieldweek in Tasmania.
The Aquarium was amazing with a massive salt water tank where you could
walk through tunnels to observe the sharks, rays, and some really big fish.
Melbourne at night facing the conference center on the left of the image. |
No comments:
Post a Comment